Teradici pcoip hardware acceleration driver#
Teradici pcoip hardware acceleration windows#

There is already a lot of optimizations of the 3D pipeline underway which is where the work will need to happen. We do want to fully leverage GPU resources when available though and know of areas we can optimize. I can't really publicly comment specifically on roadmap items. is this something that is on the roadmap for the vSGA driver? The VGX K1 board features 4 GPUs and 16 GB of graphics memory, allowing it to support up to 100 users on a single board.Īre any of you actually getting 100 active 3D clients on a host? VGX boards have an optimized multi-GPU design that helps to maximize user density. but we can hardly fault anyone for thinking otherwise when NVIDIA says: I agree with that my goal is to find out how many desktops running a specific 3D load can be realistically supported on our hardware. You also mentioned: Adding GPU acceleration is not about getting a higher consolidation ratio. What I've read in this thread tells me we may have it as good as things are today, is that right? Is there something specifically built into Kepler which may provide lower latency in the future but is not yet fully utilized in vSGA?

I've been testing a K2 for a few weeks now and can't say I've been able to reduce lag when compared to a non-Kepler machine, despite many optimization tweaks. With this technology, the virtual desktop screen is pushed directly to the remoting protocol. NVIDIA’s patented low-latency remote display technology greatly improves the user experience by reducing the lag that users feel when interacting with their virtual machine. I always take marketing material with doses of salt.

Teradici pcoip hardware acceleration driver#

Is this a driver limitation for VMware at the moment? I'll assume that engine can decode as well, so that would suggest Kepler is atleast capable of assisting with video renders. The Kepler GPU includes a high-performance H.264 encoding engine capable of encoding simultaneous streams with superior quality. I ask because NVIDIA's marketing material for the Grid K1 and K2 boards makes this claim: You mentioned that ' Today video is not accelerated by the GPU.'. Thanks for all your replies on this post, it's good to have some clarity. Im just not sure if my expectations are too high or if there really is something wrong with the setup. If i do this and move my mouse pointer from the top left to the bottom right, the pointer itself arrives there ahead of the box being drawn. Fox example, just click and hold the mouse button to draw a simple select box on the desktop (like if you were highlighting multiple icons). Just to be clear, it is not significant in time (less than a second) but it is very noticable that you are working on a machine that is not local to you. I have tried tuning everything i can think of to get the lag to go away but really nothing has helped. Single monitor setups only at 1920x1080 resolution using pcoip on tera1 zero clients. Servers and storage are barely showing any load at all in iops, cpu usage and total ram. We have 3 esxi hosts Dell R720 with (2) hex core cpus and 192gb ram each. We are only running 40 VMs with 20 in use at any one time. We have a dedicated ibm v7000 fiber san with SSD disks for these VM desktops. I've looked at the teradici apex cards but from what I have read, it doesnt sound like they give better performance so much as take the burden off the server CPU which is definitely not a problem at this point.

Why is this? Does vmware view (5.1) really not work well with these larger monitors and higher resolutions? Would graphics offload cards help at all? Im struggling to find where exactly the problem is and how it is best resolved. We've noticed that if we set the zero clients to a lower (non-native) resolution of 1024x768, then the performance increases greatly and is comparable to a physical workstation.

Teradici pcoip hardware acceleration windows#

Windows are slow when resizing/dragging, video playback is choppy, scrolling in internet explorer stutters and we have one particular application that lags tremendously when switching menus.

The problem we are having is graphical performance is pretty bad. This is a very robust setup which can run many more than the 20 VMs we are running. storage is on ibm v7000 FC san with SSD drives. The server hardware is barely being taxed at all. We have 20 VM's running right now on 3 esxi servers (192GB ram, dual 6 core xeon processors). They are running at 1920 x 1080 native resolution. We are starting deployment of Win7 enterprise virtual desktops in our organization using 23' LG all in 1 zero clients (pcoip).